Quantcast
Channel: Arkansas Times
Viewing all 40741 articles
Browse latest View live

UAMS meets with employees to talk budget problems

$
0
0
At a closed meeting with employees today, the leadership at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences sought to explain why the institution had to fire 258 people and end 600 positions. Some answers already have been provided in stories in the Times, including this one. UAMS called the meeting, leadership said earlier, because of the "rumors" swirling about future terminations.

The Times is told that Interim Chancellor Stephanie Gardner used slides to explain that reserves at UAMS had been depleted by nearly 70 percent since 2011. She said increasing the Medical School's tuition would have little positive effect on the budget, though in an answer to a question after her presentation, she said the UA Board of Trustees advocates for raising tuition. UAMS has begged for more state funding, and Gardner said she had met with legislators this week and that they had lots of questions for her.

Gardner said there were no plans for additional layoffs, but there was potential for more. She said the layoffs represented 5.6 percent of the workforce, the Times is told.

One person in the audience noted that UAMS employees at Arkansas Children's Hospital — where UAMS terminated its biostatistician team, among others — were being funded by grants from the Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence of the National Institutes of Health, dollars that follow the grantees. Gardner replied that it's possible the grants didn't fully fund salaries of researchers. She did not address a question that has been raised elsewhere: Didn't firing grantees cost UAMS dollars directed by the grants to the institution?

Also in response to a question, Gardner said some highly paid administrators were among those fired. She did not identify them. The Times has asked for a list of the 258 occupied positions but has not received it.

Gardner also described Jan. 8, when employees received notice and were escorted off campuses — some by police, as the most difficult day she'd experienced at UAMS. Difficult for 258 others, too.

City sues mayoral candidates for exploratory committee activities; mayor's violation of same ordinance not covered

$
0
0

As directed by the Little Rock City Board, City Attorney Tom Carpenter today sued for a declaratory judgment that Warwick Sabin and Frank Scott, candidates for Little Rock mayor, are violating a city ordinance by raising money for exploratory committees to run for mayor.

City ordinance prohibits fund-raising for city office sooner than five months before an election, with this election scheduled in November.

The state Ethics Commission, to which an ally of Mayor Mark Stodola complained about this fund-raising earlier, has said, however, that the exploratory committees are allowed by state law and declined to take action.

The suit names the Ethics Commission, Sabin, Scott and their exploratory committees.

By allowing Sabin and Scott to raise money, the lawsuit argues, that state is denying equal protection to incumbent officials who cannot raise money until June 1 and may not create an exploratory committee to raise money for an office he or she already holds It says the state Ethics Commission should be made to enforce the city ordinance and the judge should order appropriate equitable remedies.

Carpenter asks that the case, assigned to Judge Chris Piazza, be expedited.

It's an exercise is gross hypocrisy. Mayor Mark Stodola is sitting in blatant violation of the same city ordinance by holding onto a $78,000 in contributions leftover from previous campaigns. By terms of the same 1997 ordinance the City Board wants Carpenter to enforce, Stodola should have refunded that money to contributors or distributed it to specified legal recipients, such as charities. Carpenter makes the convoluted argument that state law prohibits enforcement of this part of the ordinance, but not the part about a short fund-raising period.

Sabin and Scott's committees are acknowledged end-runs around the fund-raising limit, passed as a good government measure in 1990 so as to discourage pay-to-play contributions to city officials timed with important votes.  Stodola's long flouting of the ordinance is just, well, flouting of the law.

It's a mess. The ordinance needs to be fixed, or clarified, though the state controls municipal law and a legislative fix would likely have to be a precursor.

Sabin has raised about $120,000 according to his most recent report, Scott about $75,000.

Sabin issued a statement:

"The three-term incumbent mayor is utilizing taxpayer-funded government resources to sue his potential political challengers because he wants to maintain a rigged system instead of allowing a level playing field. Warwick Sabin’s exploratory efforts continue to build momentum and he is picking up more support every day, which is why the entrenched mayor and his cronies are so desperate to stop him. This is yet another example of why we need real change in Little Rock, and Warwick Sabin will continue pressing forward to offer new energy and new ideas for our city."
Scott said he'd have a statement after he has a chance to read the lawsuit.

UPDATE: From Scott:

“I am disappointed in Mayor Stodola and his decision to proceed with costly litigation, particularly after the State Ethics Commission confirmed the validity of my exploratory committee back in October. Rather than focus on the rise in violent crime or stagnant job growth in Little Rock, Stodola seeks to obstruct the democratic process by attempting to prevent potential challengers from forming exploratory committees,” stated Frank Scott, Jr.

For months, Stodola and Carpenter have attempted to prevent the Scott exploratory committee from operating despite being validly registered with the Pulaski County Clerk’s Office. Prosecuting Attorney Larry Jegley also made it clear that he would not prosecute any exploratory committee under the provision of the City Code Stodola is seeking to enforce.

City Code and Arkansas law authorizing exploratory committees suggests that Little Rock residents considering municipal elected office can avail themselves of exploratory committees. Once formal campaigns are launched, they are then subject to the City Code’s restrictions on fundraising and the use of carryover funds from previous campaigns.

Also worth noting is that Mayor Stodola is seeking to improperly enforce one section of the City Code that would prevent the Scott exploratory committee from operating all while failing to comply with another section of the same City Code that prevents him from carrying over campaign funds from his 2014 campaign.

Scott continued, “Little Rock faces real challenges, and none of those challenges involve my exploratory committee, which has followed applicable state law. Despite Stodola’s desperate attempt, I remain encouraged by the broad-based support my exploratory committee has received across the city. We are exploring a run for mayor because Little Rock is in desperate need of bold leadership. Let’s embrace those who bring new ideas to the table rather than try to silence them in favor of the status quo. Dismissing this lawsuit and repealing the ordinance are the only way to ensure that every Little Rock voter has their voice heard as we approach another city election.”


On political points, it's hard to see Stodola getting the win here if he tries to pin something on Sabin and Scott while using his own ill-gotten boodle. The acquiesence of other board members in the legal action is naked incumbent protection and yet another illustration why voters might take a broom to this superannuated bunch. (In fairness, the oldest board member, Erma Hendrix, voted against going to court. The youngest, Ken Richardson, wasn't present for the vote.) The other eight directors voted aye. The mayor doesn't vote, but he's obviously the instigator of the issue.

It occurs to me that Stodola could give his carryover to charity now, though that would be long past the ordinance deadline to do so, and say he'll put himself on the same footing as he expects Sabin and Scott to follow. Given his devotion to causes of the business establishment and the freeway building industry, he can count on plenty of money pouring in.

Democratic candidates set session on health care

$
0
0
Three Democratic candidates have scheduled a "town hall" on health care at 5:15 p.m. Thursday, Jan. 25, at the Carmichael Community Center in Searcy.

Participating are Chintan Desai, running in the 1st District; 2nd district candidate Paul Spencer, and 4th District candidate Hayden Shamel. They are not the only Democratic candidates for Congress. Gwen Combs is also running in the 2nd; Robert Butler has announced in the 1st; Robert Davis in the 4th, and Josh Mahony is running in the 3rd. Republicans hold all four seats and a variety of independent and Libertarian candidates have also announced. A news release from Desai says the lineup should not be taken as an endorsement of any candidate. Searcy is in the 2nd District.

The release promises remarks from the candidates and "national health care activists and local health care providers" followed by a Q&A session.made before the event for questions and interviews.

Woman killed, child shot near North Little Rock

$
0
0

This just in from the Pulaski sheriff's office:

Around 6:30 am received a call in reference to a shooting at the McCain Place apt. Initial information a mother with three children was outside the building when she was approached by subject with a ski mask. Subject shot the mother and a five-year-old child. The other children were able to flee. Suspect left running south in the complex. PIO on scene gathering details.
The apartments, known as the Chapel Ridge Apartments, lie outside the eastern city limits of North Little Rock on McCain Place, off the old Jacksonville highway.

UPDATE: The mother is reported in critical condition. KARK reports from the scene say the gunman walked up to the woman and started firing without a word.

UPDATE: The sheriff's office says the mother has died and the child is in stable condition.

The victim was leaving her apartment shortly before 6:30 am and was walking toward her car with four children. A subject approached and shot her and the 5-year-old child she was carrying. Other children were present at the time of the shooting and had fled when the shooting began. The adult victim has died. The child is in stable condition.
April Harris, 30, has died.  Uninjured were a nine-year-old and 10-year-old twins. The shooter was wearing a ski mask and dark clothing.

Little Rock native judge starts appellate career with an alarming bang

$
0
0
John Bush, the Little Rock native lawyer appointed by Donald Trump to the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals over widespread criticism given his harshly ideological past, has started his appellate career with a bang.

From Slate, an article headlined "An awful ruling from one of Trump's worst judicial appointees":

Donald Trump has nominated a number of egregiously unqualified and objectionable people to the federal judiciary, but thus far only one truly outrageous nominee has been confirmed.

John K. Bush, who serves on the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, is a former blogger who spread birther conspiracies, used the word faggot in a speech, and urged Congress to “gag”“Mama Pelosi.” He nevertheless received unanimous Republican support in the Senate.

On Wednesday, Bush handed down his first published opinion in a constitutional case, Peffer v. Stephens. He used the occasion to create a new rule that guts the Fourth Amendment’s protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. In an astonishingly broad decision, Bush held that if a suspect may have used his home computer in commission of a crime, law enforcement officials have probable cause to search his entire house. Most of Trump’s judicial appointees share a similar jurisprudential philosophy. Bush’s ruling provides an early warning that these judges will not be eager to stand up for Americans’ right to privacy.

John Wesley Hall, a Little Rock defense lawyer who alerted me to the decision, has written about Bush's opinion on his widely read blog on 4th Amendment (search and seizure) issues.

A computer, like a gun, is usually kept in the home, and a search warrant for a computer establishes nexus to search defendant’s house[!, really?]. 
Bad as Bush is — and that's bad — he's not the worst of Trump's judges and Senate Republicans are waving them through at breakneck speed.

Game and Fish Commission OKs open carry

$
0
0
The state Game and Fish Commission on Thursdayofficially blessed Thursday open carry of handguns on its properties.
The news release:

The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission approved a regulation change today which will allow people to openly carry a handgun for personal protection while on any wildlife management area or Commission-controlled property or lake.

Previously, only people with valid concealed carry permits could possess handguns while on a wildlife management area, unless there was a hunting season in which the handgun would be legal. Concealed carry permit holders may still carry a concealed handgun, and anyone legally possessing a handgun (as defined by Ark. Code Ann. §5-73-120) on Commission-owned or -controlled property or while hunting, fishing or trapping on private property as long as it is: (1) for personal protection and either is not employed for hunting or is a legal killing device for a hunting season that is open, and (2) the handgun is otherwise lawfully possessed.

“This clarification was the result of enforcement and wildlife management staff listening to concerned citizens and working to benefit all parties,” said Col. Greg Rae, chief of the AGFC Enforcement Division.
The Commission is appointed by the governor. Gov. Asa Hutchinson faces a gun nut opponent in the Republican primary. He's already declared his belief that Arkansas is an open carry state, though no court case has yet firmly established that legal view. The gun toters are in the ascendancy. One question yet to be answered — and it's being asked already by the hard-line gun crowd: If unlimited carry is the law of the land, where does the state get off saying a permit is necessary for concealed carry?  And, furthermore, where does it get off saying where guns may or may not be carried? In short, they'd say: What part of "shall not be infringed" don't the powers that be understand? Game and Fish has heard their cry.

Time for the Capitol Police and the attorney general's police force to agree that open carry is fine in their buildings, too.

CLARIFICATION: I'm seeking confirmation from Game and Fish, but I suspect this guidance doesn't pertain to buildings, such as headquarters or nature centers. Existing state law that applies to open carry explicitly bars the carrying of loaded weapons  in public buildings. Changes to the law pertaining to concealed carry expanded buildings to which CONCEALED weapons may be carried to include most public buildings for those with the enhanced permits that may be received with additional training.

Little Rock School District receives six proposals for Woodruff school

$
0
0

After a proposal to develop the vacant Woodruff school for apartments fell through, the Little Rock School District asked for new proposals and I've now received a list of six expressions of interest, which were outlined at a recent neighborhood meeting.

Moses Tucker real estate had been chosen as a buyer with a proposal to redevelop the building on Seventh Street, near Woodrow, for apartments and other uses, but decided it was too expensive.

Superintendent Michael Poore has been trying to find a new proposal so that the school doesn't become immediately available for charter school use under a new state law aimed at favoring charters to take over public school buildings, whether there's a need for a charter school or not.

The district has received six proposals, with bids ranging from $80,000 to $500,000, for ideas ranging from apartment development to a possible teardown for apartments and to two proposals for use as "education facilities"— one for martial arts training and autistic children combined and another, by HERE4KIDS, for an education facility for learning disability intervention. HERE4KIDS already exists as a nonprofit to provide services to home school students with special instructional needs, such as dyslexia. It has applied in the past for state approval to open a charter school in North Little Rock and to qualify for participation in the new state voucher program that uses tax-credit financed money to pay for private school tuition for children with special education needs.

I haven't received the fulfillment of my followup request to LRSD for the actual proposals, which should reveal more details about ownership and backing of the groups seeking the property. But here's what the district has provided so far:


[pdf-1]From a cursory web search: The C Street Group is related to real estate agent Lance Levi. A corporation known as Fairfield Historic Properties turns up in building permits as a developer of, among others, some apartments on Center Street.

More when I have it.

Stodola defends his carryover fund

$
0
0

I asked Mayor Mark Stodola for a comment yesterday after the city sued his two mayoral challengers, Warwick Sabin and Frank Scott Jr., for raising money for the race through exploratory committees while a city ordinance nominally prevents fund-raising for city races until June 1.

That same ordinance also prohibits city candidates from carrying over money from past races. Stodola has $78,000 on hand from an unchallenged 2014 race and I asked him if he intended to use it for this year's campaign.

His response:

I intend to follow the law and abide and respect the law. I have given carry over money to charitable causes and have returned contributions to all who have requested. I have asked for opinions on the proper handling of carry over funds and have followed the law as given provided. Other city directors have done the same since 2010.

In the instance of Mr. Sabin, he also has had carryover funds and has chosen to use them in various ways including purchasing campaign software merely 2 weeks before he announced his campaign for Mayor. Surely that was not for a state rep campaign. Sabin and Scott were sent copies of the campaign finance laws immediately after they announced the formation of their committees. Mr. Carpenter advised them that the campaign timeline limitations applied to all municipal campaigns, exploratory or otherwise. They have recklessly chosen to ignore the law and the advice of the city attorney. Why don’t you report on these issues fairly?
I'll take that as a "yes" to my core question.

Stodola is ignoring the plain language of an ordinance that he wants enforced in part against his challengers. The perintnent portion, adopted in 1997:

Sec. 2-389. - Balance of funds over expenses.

Within thirty (30) days following a general election, if there is no campaign deficit, a candidate for municipal office shall turn over any balance of campaign funds over expenses incurred as of the day of election either to:

(a) The city for the benefit of the city general fund; or (b) A nonprofit organization which is exempt from taxation under section 501(c)(3) of the United State Internal Revenue Code; or (c) The contributors to the candidate's campaign; or (d) A combination of the entities listed in this subsection.
Stodola has been provided cover by City Attorney Tom Carpenter. Carpenter argues that state law prevents the city from placing restrictions on use of this carryover money, but the state law cited by the state Ethics Commission on the Sabin and Scott exploratory committees does NOT override the ordinance on early fund-raising.

Nobody is covered with glory here. Sabin and Scott are exploiting a legal loophole. That it's legal in the eyes of the state doesn't mean it doesn't run counter to the spirit of the 1997 ordinance. Stodola is a hypocrite for orchestrating a lawsuit against Sabin and Scott while choosing to find his own loophole (and incumbent advantage) to use money city ordinance clearly says he should not use.

Frank Scott's right. The ordinance should be repealed. Lawyer Chris  Burks, who'll likely represent Sabin, has been arguing for some time that the city's ordinance is a bad idea because it offers a template for cities to impose a variety of restrictions outside state law on fund-raising. It is better, he says, to have a single state law universally applicable. That's certainly so if the law that exists can be interpreted — and prosecuted — to suit those in power. As Burks notes, Carpenter works at the pleasure of Stodola and the City Board, which directed him to file this suit to protect their interest in restricting challengers' ability to campaign. Legal, maybe. A conflict of interest? Yes. But it follows the pattern set by the state legislature, which has favored itself with generous carryover provisions and the ability to raise that money even when they have no election opposition. What's the power of incumbency worth if not employed in self-interest?

UPDATE: Stodola reiterated this morning to a followup question:

The city attorney has issued a formal legal opinion that officeholders may have carryover funds. He issued this opinion after changes in the [state] law. I am complying with the law, not ignoring it.
UPDATE II: Warwick Sabin says Stodola is "100 percent incorrect" in what he said about his use of state legislative campaign funds. "It just demonstrates he can't even get his facts straight."

Sabin said the expenditure Stodola cited for campaign software was to close out an account with a software provider he used in three state legislative races. He's using different software in the mayoral race and his exploratory campaign committee reports show payments to that provider with money raised for that purpose.

"I never used carryover funds to pay for exploratory efforts," Sabin said.



No Small Talk Episode 2: CAMA, The Post and Beth Ann Fennelly

$
0
0
On week two of "No Small Talk" we've got: a Central Arkansas Music Award (CAMA) rundown,  discussion about "The Post" and lots of recommendations.

For our 'Post' banter, Jacob, Stephanie and Omaya welcome in Arkansas Times staff writer David Koon to talk about the latest Spielberg film and a love of Linotype. He reviewed the film for us last week.

If you're interested in CAMA, check out our A&E feature on it.

We made recommendations too. Here are some links:

* Alan J. Pakula's films (After struggling to pronounce this on the podcast, embarrassing myself, I looked it up and it's PAUL-KA-LA; so if you want to make the recommendation too sans blundering over the name, there you go. )
* PALLBEARER preview
* Our own Stephanie Smittle interviews Beth Ann Fennelly on Jan. 25. You can buy Fennelly's new book of micro-memoirs here.
* Showtimes for "Call Me By Your Name" and "Phantom Thread"



Tom Cotton gets rapped by colleague

$
0
0
This assessment of Sen. Tom Cotton, reported by an MSNBC reporter, is not a compliment.

If you didn't know, Rep. Steve King is nuts.

UPDATE: Here's more on Graham's remarks. He's one of several Republican senators who won't go along with the stopgap House spending bill, meaning Republicans can't muster a majority of the Senate from their own party. He blames Trump for taking guidance from Cotton and Stephen Miller.

Trump earlier this week rejected a bipartisan deal that would have protected DACA beneficiaries and cleared the way for a funding bill, after initially expressing a willingness to sign such a deal. Graham laid the blame for the impasse on Trump’s flip-flop and his listening to bad advice from two people: White House aide Stephen Miller and freshman Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR).

“I think the change comes about from people like Mr. Miller,” Graham said. “Mr. Miller is well-known in the Senate for having views that are outside the mainstream.” Graham observed that the “Steven Miller approach to immigration has no viability.”

He expressed openness to solutions, but said the Trump White House is taking a “a hard-edged approach” that would not fly even in the GOP-controlled U.S. Senate. “The Tom Cotton approach has no viability here. He’s become sort of the Steve King of the Senate. I like Tom but on immigration, he’s putting something on the table that there’s just no market for in phase one.” (Rep. Steve King (R-IA) is an immigration hardliner with a long history of racist comments.)

Senator questions Medicaid chief's involvement in waiver discussions with Arkansas

$
0
0
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) has raised questions about Medicaid administrator Seema Verma's participation in rule waivers for three states, including Arkansas because she'd previously been paid for Medicaid consulting work for those states.

Talking Points Memo broke the story this morning.

In a letter dated Jan. 19 to the general counsel of the Department of Health and Human Services obtained by TPM, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) is requesting an investigation into the potential conflicts of interest of Seema Verma, the administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), particularly her handling of waiver requests from Arkansas, Kentucky, and Iowa.

“Recent statements by governors representing multiple states indicate that Administrator Verma has personally and substantially participated in waivers submitted to CMS by states that were clients of her previous consulting business,” Wyden wrote.


In a letter to Robert Charrow, general counsel, Wyden questions whether Verma has run afoul of an ethics agreement she entered when hired as administrator of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Wyden details reports, including here, that Verma has talked with officials in Kentucky, Arkansas and Iowa about waiver requests. Arkansas is seeking permission to put a work requirement on Medicaid recipients. She has granted such a waiver to Kentucky, but still has Arkansas's request under review. Arkansas officials indicated that they were hopeful it would be approved. Arkansas also wants to lower the income level at which people may qualify from 138 to 100 percent of the federal poverty level. NOTE CORRECTION: I had the percentages reversed previously.

We wrote earlier about Verma's past work for Arkansas, through a contract her company had with Hewlett Packard. HHS told me then that Verma had received approval to discuss waivers with Arkansas.

Wyden said it appeared Verma's agreement to recuse from matters involving former clients had "fallen short of the mark." He's asked for a record of the waivers granted to Verma for talking with the affected states and also asked for communications between Verma and the states. (I FOI'ed this same material in Arkansas earlier this week, but haven't received a response yet.)

HHS told me earlier this week that the department gave Verma approval to work on matters affecting Arkansas shortly after she was appointed and the authorization remained in effect and need not be renewed for each meeting with the state. Wyden's office apparently believes that approval was insufficient under terms of her agreement.

Here's Wyden's letter.

PS: Another cozy element. Former Hutchinson staffer Vu Ritchie is now senior counselor for Verma at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Legislative Council approves dicamba ban

Former legislator arrested for theft

$
0
0
The Texarkana Gazette reports thatFonda Hawthorne, 61,who served one term in the state House as a Democrat from Ashdown in 2013 and 2014, was arrested this week for theft — making some $16,000 in questionable charges on the debit card of the Little River Chamber of Commerce, of which she is executive director.

Officers investigated after a tip from a bank.

She made a court appearance Thursday and was released on a $7,500 bond.

TGIF open line

$
0
0

Another week done. Today's video roundup leads with the looming government shutdown.

The Tough Talkin' Tom Cotton Edition

$
0
0

Tough talkin’Tom Cotton, a major state Supreme Court decision and a pivotal lawsuit for Little Rock politics— on this week's podcast.

Subscribe via iTunes.

Download.

In February, Little Rock District Court will aid those with misdemeanor warrants

$
0
0
This February, the Little Rock District Court's criminal division will be helping people with active warrants resulting from misdemeanors address their warrants without arrest.

All month (except for on Feb. 19, which is a federal holiday) the court will be open from 8 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. for an amnesty program — dealing with warrants resulting from failure to appear, failure to pay fines, or failure to comply (for example, by not doing community service required by the court) on misdemeanor charges.

Those with warrants can come and "address the warrants without the fear of going to jail on that warrant," said Natalie Short, senior probation officer for the court.

The only requirements are that the charge is a misdemeanor charge and within purview of the Little Rock District Court's criminal division; not, for example, traffic court. One can call 501-371-4725 with questions, according to a flyer (both in Spanish and English; linked at the bottom of this post) publicizing the initiative.

Judge Hugh Finkelstein, who was part of a team that had been planning this since at least late 2017, will preside. Public defenders will also be present for those with active warrants to ensure proper representation.

The last such program, Short said, occurred about three years ago and only on Fridays.

"[We're] hoping to reach more people," she said. "I don’t think we have any expectations, but the real hope is that people do come."

They should have something to address.

Emma Pettit recently wrote for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette on the problem of people being jailed for failure to appear in Pulaski County. According to her numbers, 27 percent of people booked into the jail in 2017 had a failure to appear charge. And a whooping 7 percent — 1,580 people — were arrested exclusively for failure to appear charge in 2017, Pettit reported.




[pdf-1]

Government shuts down, blame game underway

$
0
0

The Senate last night failed to approve
the House-passed budget resolution, bringing about a government shutdown.

Orchestrated blame games have begun with the predictable partisan spinning. But some key points:

* Four Republican senators joined most Democrats in opposing the continuing resolution.

* The Republican leadership pitched the vote as children (continuation of the children's health insurance program) against immigrants (the insistence of Democrats and some Republicans to do something about the "dreamers"). But CHIP expired months ago and could have long ago been re-authorized separately if the Republicans were really serious about that program. There is a bipartisan 60-vote majority in the Senate that supports a solution for the dreamers, or the DACA element of the bill.

* Trump (and hard liners like Sen. Tom Cotton) won't settle for anything but punitive immigration legislation.

* There's talk of another stopgap solution today while an effort is made to have a separate vote on DACA.

Everyone shares in the government shutdown at some level. But a fish rots at its head. This chaos looks most of Donald Trump's making.

Arkansas Republican voted predictably and spun predictability, blaming Democrats for forsaking children. The spin is dishonest, but what's new? Bottom line, for the first time anyone can recall, a party in control of the White House and Congress will preside over a government shutdown and try to blame the minority for it.

UA releases details on assistant football coach payroll of $4.6 million

$
0
0

Late last night, the University of Arkansas released details on most of the agreements reached to pay new assistant Razorback football coaches. It's a payroll of more than $4.6 million for assistant coaches alone.

New head coach Chad Morris is being paid $3.5 million, a bit under the $4 million fifth-year coach Bret Bielema was being paid before he was fired at the end of the season. This makes total payroll around $8 million, exclusive of other perks including insurance, retirement contributions and numerous other benefits.

The UA responded to an Arkansas Times Freedom of Information Act request after the information was released publicly. The UA had refused FOI requests for preliminary documents on grounds —"active use" and "competitive disadvantage"— to which I had objected. It is still withholding some information.

Said Rebecca Morrison, who handles FOI requests, in an e-mail last night:

As previously shared, written agreements have been presented to all assistant coaches, and while agreed to in principle, not all have been executed or returned. However, we are at a point, we believe, that the competitive disadvantage of providing the offered financial terms of those agreements not fully executed is minimized and are willing to provide a summary of those terms of offer. While not obligated to create a record, we are attempting to be helpful. We will continue to supplement our responses with final executed copies of the other employment agreements as they are completed. We maintain the position that releasing drafts of unsigned agreements being negotiated places the university at a significant competitive disadvantage; therefore, we still consider those records to be exempt pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 25-19-105(b)(9). 
John Chavis will be paid $995,000 as defensive coordinator through a combination of university salary and other enhancements under a deal that provides for a potential two-year extension in which pay could rise to $1.2 million. Other bonuses are possible — for bowl games, for example — and there are a variety of perks including health insurance, retirement contributions, tuition reductions, a car, moving expenses and private club membership. The agreement has an extensive section on payments in the event of termination by either party.

Here's the Chavis contract.

Another top hire, offensive coordinator Joe Cradduck, will be paid $600,000 according to a summary provided by UA, but his contract wasn't included in those released. I have asked whether the $600,000 figure reported in the summary is university salary alone or represents the combination of university pay and other enhancements, for speaking appearances and the like, that have traditionally been the responsibility of the private Razorback Foundation.

Trumain Carroll
will be paid $290,000 as head strength and conditioning coach, plus the assortment of perks.

Here's the Carroll contract.

Steve Caldwell will be paid $360,000 as defensive line coach, plus potential bonuses and perks.

Here's the Caldwell contract.

Secondary coach Mark Smith will be paid $225,000, plus add-ons.

Here's the Smith contract.

Running backs coach Jeff Traylor will be paid $370,000, plus add-ons.

Here's the Traylor contract.

Defensive line coach John Scott Jr. will be paid $340,000.

Here's the Scott contract.

While we had made FOI requests for the top three coaches, the UA provided new contracts for most other hires by head coach Chad Morris and also offered this pay summary for other coaches whose contracts were not provided:

What does the government shutdown mean?

$
0
0

The effects of the government shutdown will be wide-ranging if an interim solution isn't reached today, but Hot Springs tourism officials have emphasized most everything in the national park, such as Oaklawn Park, will operate as usual today.

“Although it is unclear how the government shutdown will affect the national park here in the city, the rest of our many attractions are up and running as usual and ready for our thousands of visitors,” said Steve Arrison, CEO of Visit Hot Springs.

“There is a full Saturday card of live racing at Oaklawn, and the other things to see and do in Hot Springs are operating as normal. Oaklawn Gaming is open for business as usual.”
Also: The Clinton National Airport advises no impact on airport. TSA and other federal employees will be at work.

According to guidance distributed Friday, some national park operations in Hot Springs and everywhere else will be affected. Employees at the Clinton Presidential Library, under the National Archives, were told last week it would be closed in the event of a shutdown. Here's that National Park guidance.

Dear colleague,

While we fully expect the government to remain open, in the event of a shutdown national parks will remain as accessible as possible while still following all applicable laws and procedures. For example, roads already open will remain open, and vault toilets/wilderness type restrooms will remain open. However, services that require staffing and maintenance such as campgrounds and full service restrooms will not be operating. Monuments and memorials in Washington DC will remain open.

Examples of services that could be open include free-standing gift shops, lodges, restaurants, or gas stations that require no assistance from park staff to operate. Assistance could include but is not limited to snow removal, unlocking gates, or other operational functions. However, if a private concessioner has arranged in advance to remove snow, trash, etc. without the assistance of park staff, they may continue operations.

Examples of services that would not be open include visitor centers, gift shops located inside visitor centers, and gas stations located on roads inside parks that are impassable due to snow accumulation, if snow removal relies on park staff.

Examples of areas that may see restricted access include some public lands, trails, and sites that are typically monitored and patrolled by staff for purposes of visitor safety and resource protection. For example, park staff may restrict access to ski or snowshoe areas if there is an avalanche risk. Additionally, sensitive cultural areas on all public lands may have restricted access to protect artifacts and objects.

We are prioritizing access to the most iconic and typically accessible areas of parks and public lands. Each park will have different plans in place. To learn more about a specific park’s plans, please check the park’s webpages at NPS.gov as well as their social media feeds. You may contact a park directly as well. Contact information is available on park webpages.

-Donald Leadbetter
Tourism Program Manager
National Park Service


Careful what you believe on the Internet, Bud Cummins edition

$
0
0

The peril of the Internet is being sharply illustrated by a false narrative —propagated in part by Russian bots— that a secret memo exists that puts the screws to the FBI investigation of Russian collusion with the Trump campaign.

It's inspired the hash tag #ReleaseTheMemo and Republicans such as U.S. Rep. French Hill (he of the meeting with a key Russian operative) are dutifully parroting it. The story is nonsense, as Think Progress outlines here — it seems to be mostly feverish conspiracy theorizing by the discredited Rep. Devin Nunes.

But I had to laugh when I saw the Tweet by Bud Cummins, the former U.S. attorney in Little Rock, one-time congressional candidate, Donald Trump Arkansas campaign leader and — as a result of that last — one of the unsettling possibilities for a Trump nomination for a federal judgeship to succeed the sterling Leon Holmes when he takes senior status, a form of retirement, this spring.

There is no Rep. Charles Ponzi in the U.S. House. This is a parody account named for the namesake of the famous financial swindle.

After a reader pointed this out to Cummins, he acknowledged he'd been had and said something to the effect that he needed better reading glasses. I failed to capture that part of the response before Cummins removed his original Tweet, which I saved above.

Here's the full "Ponzi" tweet that so moved Cummins:


Cummins is still busily retweeting this meme. Among his sources, Rep. Steve King, about as reliable as Charles Ponzi.
Viewing all 40741 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images